Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 108 N.M. 372 - Hillhaven Corp. v. Human Services Dept.

Hillhaven Corp. v. Human Services Dept.’s Empirical Analysis

1989

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
2
states following
September 1995
most recently cited

6 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on State v. Arnold · Roberson v. Board of Education of City of Santa Fe · Durand v. New Mexico Commission on Alcoholism · State v. Giraudo · State ex rel. Sisney v. Board of Com'rs

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[A] right of appeal is conferred by substantive law and is outside the supreme court's rule-making ability... . The supreme court is powerless to create a substantive right of appeal by adopting a rule. * * * * * * [T]his court is without jurisdiction to consider the matter.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.