Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 108 N.M. 479 - Paca v. K-Mart Corp.

Paca v. K-Mart Corp.’s Empirical Analysis

1989

Citation profile

28
cited by 28 later decisions
2
states following
March 2018
most recently cited

1 federal appellate · 6 district · 19 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 28 later decisions — most recently March 2018 · most notably Shovelin v. Central New Mexico Electric Cooperative, Inc. (1993), Monett v. Dona Ana County Sheriff's Posse (1992)

1 federal appellate · 6 district · 19 state decisions

1801989199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Celotex Corporation v. Catrett H · Koenig v. Perez · Vigil v. Arzola · Vigil v. Arzola · Lukoski v. Sandia Indian Management Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 28 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Though it has been said that summary judgment should not be granted if there is the ‘slightest doubt’ as to the facts, such statements are a rather misleading gloss on a rule which speaks in terms of ‘genuine issue as to any material fact,’ and would, if taken literally, mean that there could hardly ever be a summary judgment, for at least a slight doubt can be developed as to practically all things human. A better formulation would be that the party opposing the motion is to be given the benefit of all reasonable doubts in determining whether a genuine issue exists. If there are such reasonable doubts, summary judgment should be denied. A substantial dispute as to a material fact forecloses summary judgment.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “Wrongful discharge requires proof that an employee performed an act favored by public policy or failed to perform a disfavored act.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.