Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 108 N.Y. 110 - Forstman v. . Schulting

Forstman v. . Schulting’s Empirical Analysis

1888

Citation profile

24
cited by 24 later decisions
3
states following
November 1962
most recently cited

24 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 24 later decisions — most recently November 1962

24 state decisions

40188818901900191019201930194019501960decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Langley v. . Warner · Costello v. Syracuse, Binghamton New York Rail.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 24 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Both parties and attorneys, who, through the aid of the court, have come into possession of property or money during a litigation which subsequent proceedings in the action show was either wrongfully acquired or unjustly retained, may be compelled to restore it to the rightful owner, by order and attachment to enforce such restoration.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.