108 Ohio App. 3d 29 - Braun v. Pikus’s Empirical Analysis
1995
Citation profile
10 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 12 later decisions — most recently June 2024
10 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on 90 Ohio App. 3d 413 - Moore v. Jock
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The controlling factor in determining this issue is not which party appealed or which first appealed. Rather the issue turns on which party has the use of the money during the pendency of the appeal — either the judgment debtor can tender payment in full to toll the running of interest or retain use of the money and presumably invest it for the duration of the appeal.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“[W]hen money becomes due and payable * * * upon all judgments, decrees, and orders of any judicial tribunal for the payment of money arising out of tortious conduct * * * the creditor is entitled to interest * * *.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“[I]nterest on a judgment * * * rendered in a civil action based on tortious conduct * * * shall be computed from the date the judgment, decree, or order is rendered to the date on which the money is paid.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.