108 Ohio App. 3d 312 - State v. Pickett’s Empirical Analysis
1996
Citation profile
4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
March 2000
most recently cited
4 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on State v. Jenks · State v. Bridgeman · State v. Eley · 51 Ohio App. 3d 215 - State v. Wolfe · 24 Ohio App. 2d 56 - State v. Starr
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““An appellate court’s function when reviewing the sufficiency of the evidence to support a criminal conviction is to examine the evidence admitted at trial to determine whether such evidence, if believed, would convince the average mind of the defendant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. The relevant inquiry is whether, after viewing the evidence in a light most favorable to the prosecution, any rational trier of fact could have found the essential elements of the crime proven beyond a reasonable doubt.” State v. Jenks (1991), 61 Ohio St.3d 259 , 574 N.E.2d 492 , at paragraph two of the syllabus.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.