108 Ohio App. 3d 362 - State v. Correa’s Empirical Analysis
1995
Citation profile
31 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 31 later decisions — most recently April 2021 · most notably 108 Ohio App. 3d 369 - State v. Gonyou (1995), 120 Ohio App. 3d 24 - State v. Rusnak (1997)
31 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Terry v. Ohio · Florida v. Royer · Delaware v. Prouse · United States v. Brignoni-Ponce · United States v. Martinez-Fuerte
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 31 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““The trial court erred to defendant-appellant’s prejudice by overruling his motion to suppress.””
2 later decisions quote this exact passage““In State v. Smotherman * * * this court recently noted a certain similarity in the ‘patterns and practices’ of the officers in that case and in numerous other ‘Ohio cases’ which led to the conclusion that they are following a ‘script’ suggested in their drug interdiction training which calls for prolonging a traffic stop to ‘fish’ for evidence of drug activity and seek consent to search the vehicle well after the stop should have been terminated. This court noted further that the practices of separating an individual from his car and engaging the individual in ‘casual conversation’ in order to observe ‘body language’ and ‘nervousness’ are commonly implemented by officers trained in drug interdiction. See State v. Retherford (1994), 93 Ohio App.3d 586 [ 639 N.E.2d 498 ]; State v. Medina (Apr. 13, 1994), Montgomery App. No. 13883, unreported [ 1994 WL 124807 ]; State v. Finder (Dec. 15, 1993), Miami App. No. 93-CA-6, unreported [ 1993 WL 518692 ]; State v. Foster (1993), 87 Ohio App.3d 32 [ 621 N.E.2d 843 ]. Upon consideration thereof, this court determined in Smotherman that the above practices are ‘manipulative’ and that: “‘Reasonable suspicion that a detainee is engaged in criminal activity must exist for as long as the detention does. The lawfulness of the initial stop will not support a “fishing expedition” for evidence of crime. State v. Bevan [ (1992), 80 Ohio App.3d 126, 130 , 608 N.E.2d 1099, 1101-1102 ].’ (Emphasis added.)” 108 Ohio App.3d at 368, 670 N.E.2d at 1039.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“demonstrate specific and articulable facts which, when considered with the rational inferences therefrom, would, in light of the totality of the circumstances, justify a reasonable suspicion that the individual who is stopped is involved in illegal activity.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.