¶1 As pointed out in our previous opinion, and as conceded by counsel for the appellee, the dismissal of this case was not proper. However, pursuant to this court’s authority to do that which the trial court should have done, the language of today’s opinion provides the appellant with a declaration of his rights. It is on that basis that I concur.
108 Ohio App. 3d 409
670 N.E.2d 1065
Velasquez v. Ghee
Decided January 3, 1996
Ohio Court of Appeals · decided 1996-01-03
Cited by 6 later decisions — most recently August 2011
6 state decisions
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 1996-01-03
View the full empirical analysis of this case →