108 Ohio App. 3d 586 - State v. Scherer’s Empirical Analysis
1995
Citation profile
47 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 47 later decisions — most recently July 2024 · most notably 175 Ohio App. 3d 733 - State v. Yount (2008), State v. Slider (2009)
47 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Taylor v. Taintor · State v. Hughes · 12 Ohio App. 3d 162 - State v. Ohayon
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 47 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“{¶ 14} “Upon declaration of forfeiture, the magistrate or clerk of the court adjudging forfeiture shall proceed as follows: * * * (C) As to recognizances he shall notify accused and each surety by ordinary mail at the address shown by them in their affidavits of qualification or on the record of the case, of the default of the accused and the adjudication of forfeiture and require each of them to show cause on or before a date certain to be stated in the notice, and which shall be not less than twenty nor more than thirty days from date of mailing notice, why judgment should not be entered against each of them for the penalty stated in the recognizance. If good cause by production of the body of the accused or otherwise is not shown, the court or magistrate shall thereupon enter judgment against the sureties or either of them, so notified, in such amount, not exceeding the penalty of the bond, as has been set in the adjudication of forfeiture, and shall award execution therefor as in civil cases * * *.” (Emphasis added.)”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage“A surety bond is a contract in which the surety promises the court that it will pay a monetary penalty if the accused who is released on the bond posted by the surety fails to appear in court when ordered.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“a surety who seeks to avoid the penalty [of forfeiture] must demonstrate that the defendant's incarceration was not foreseeable to the surety or preventable by it.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Castaneda v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.