Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 108 OHIOMISC2D 18 - State v. Anez

State v. Anez’s Empirical Analysis

2000

Citation profile

36
cited by 36 later decisions
2
states following
April 2024
most recently cited

36 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 36 later decisions — most recently April 2024 · most notably 127 Ohio Misc. 2d 138 - State v. Weiland (2004), 119 Ohio Misc. 2d 1 - State v. Holt (2002)

36 state decisions

200200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Terry v. Ohio · Illinois v. Gates · Ornelas v. United States · Beck v. State of Ohio

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 36 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The court finds it necessary to exclude this information from consideration because the vertical gaze nystagmus test has not been approved for usage in the state of Ohio as a tool to assess alcohol consumption.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “Probable cause is a fluid concept revolving on the assessment of probabilities and particular factual contexts not readily or even usefully reduced to a neat set of legal rules.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.