108 Or. App. 196 - State v. Young’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

4 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. “"Of course, information is never stale; that phrase is a shorthand description of the analysis about whether or not the evidence sought will be there after the length of time since the event described in the affidavit occurred. The purpose of the analysis is to determine whether, given the time between the event described and issuance of the warrant, there is a reasonable inference that the evidence will be where the affidavit suggests. The length of time is only one factor in the analysis. Another important factor is the character of the crime or the thing to be seized and whether, under the circumstances, the evidence is likely to be moved or consumed." 108 Or App at 204 , 816 P.2d 612 .”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. 125 Or. App. 341 - State v. Chezem

2. “[i]f information from an informer is relied upon to establish the legality of the means by which evidence was obtained and the judge is not satisfied that the information was received from an informer reasonably believed to be reliable or credible.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. 289 Or. App. 703 - State v. Robertson

3. “may be disclosed, even for an in camera disclosure, only if the trial court 'is not satisfied that the information was received from an informer reasonably believed to be reliable or credible.'”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. 289 Or. App. 703 - State v. Robertson