Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

108 Or. App. 488

State v. Dunkin

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided August 21, 1991

Court of Appeals of Oregon · decided 1991-08-21

Decided 1991-08-21

PER CURIAM

¶1Defendant appeals her conviction for possession of a controlled substance. ORS 475.992(4). We affirm her conviction without discussion and write only to address her assignment that the court imposed an improper condition of probation.

¶2The trial court suspended imposition of sentence and placed defendant on two years probation. As a condition of probation, it ordered that she “[s]ubmit person, residence, vehicle, and property to search by probation officer.” We accept the state’s concession that the condition does not conform to ORS 137.540(2)(m), which requires that there be reasonable grounds to justify any search. The condition of probation must be vacated and the case remanded for resentencing. State v. Ward, 102 Or App 679, 680, 794 P2d 833 (1990); State v. Schwab, 95 Or App 593, 771 P2d 277 (1989).

¶3Conviction affirmed; condition of probation allowing search by probation officer vacated; remanded for resentencing.

/108/orapp/488 · .json · Public domain