Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 108 ORAPP 659 - Daniels v. Wright

Daniels v. Wright’s Empirical Analysis

1991

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
July 2018
most recently cited

2 district · 2 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[t]he date of entry of the judgment of conviction is the date the right to petition for post-conviction relief 'accrues' " under ORS 138.510 ; rejecting petitioner's argument that his right to PCR accrued on date he entered no contest plea). 8 In addition, ORS 138.530(1)(b) provides, as another ground for post-conviction relief, the "[l]ack of jurisdiction of the court to impose the judgment rendered upon petitioner's conviction .”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “the date the judgment or order on the conviction was entered in the register”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.