Andrijevic v. Kelleran’s Empirical Analysis
1988
Citation profile
645 federal appellate · 184 district · 344 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 1,656 later decisions (6 by the Supreme Court) — most recently September 2017 · most notably Penson v. Ohio (1988), Lujan v. National Wildlife Federation (1990)
645 federal appellate · 184 district · 344 state decisions — followed in 35 states
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Cited together with United Families of America v. Kendrick · Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc. · Celotex Corporation v. Catrett H · Strickland v. Washington · McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Green
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1,656 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(e) Covenants: The Buyer [IPC] covenants and agrees with the Seller [KCPL] that the Buyer will take possession and control of the Iowa Properties at 5:00 p.m., Central Standard Time, on the Closing Date and that from and after such time the Buyer will assume and will indemnify the Seller against all liabilities and obligations of every kind and character whatsoever arising subsequent to the closing date as pertain to the business and operations of the Iowa Properties, including obligations and liabilities arising subsequent to the Closing Date on account of contracts and other commitments made by the Seller in the ordinary course of business prior to the Closing Date, except any liability arising out of certain litigation now pending in the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit, entitled First Iowa Hydro Electric Cooperative, et al., v. Iowa-Illinois Gas and Electric Company, et al., Civil Nos. 15548 and 15549.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.