Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 108 SO2D 772 - Folmar v. Davis

Folmar v. Davis’s Empirical Analysis

1959

Citation profile

23
cited by 23 later decisions
1
states following
January 1985
most recently cited

22 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 23 later decisions — most recently January 1985

22 state decisions

1101959196019701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Baruch v. Giblen · Monroe v. Birdsey · 94 So. 2d 589 - Powell v. Cocowitch

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 23 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “"[1-3] The determination of the amount of the recovery was largely in the discretion of the trier of facts taking into consideration the service performed, the responsibility incurred, the nature of the service, the skill and time required, the circumstances under which it was rendered, the customary charges for like service, the amount involved, and the importance and results of the litigation. Also in estimating the value of an attorney's services his skill, experience, professional reputation, and even his amount of business may be taken into consideration. The testimony of expert witnesses is to aid and assist in the determination, but such testimony is neither conclusive nor binding on the court or the jury. See Munroe v. Birdsey, 102 Fla. 544 , 136 So. 886 ; Baruch v. Giblin, 122 Fla. 59 , 164 So. 831 ; Powell v. Cocowitch, Fla. 1957, 94 So.2d 589 ."”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.