Thompson v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2003
Citation profile
5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
1
states following
February 2019
most recently cited
1 federal appellate · 2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Powell v. State of Alabama Patterson · Massiah v. United States · Moran v. Burbine · McNeil v. Wisconsin
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“the defendant's own incriminating statements, obtained by federal agents under the circumstances here disclosed, could not constitutionally be used by the prosecution as evidence against him at his trial.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Thompson v. Davis“even know that he was under interrogation by a government agent.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Thompson v. Davis
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.