Gilmore v. Waples’s Empirical Analysis
1916
Citation profile
4 district · 120 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 126 later decisions — most recently June 2017 · most notably City of Mason v. West Texas Utilities Co. (1951), Stanford v. Butler (1944)
4 district · 120 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 126 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““It is the undoubted right of a political party to make nominations for the elective officers of the people. The Legislature has the authority to prescribe reasonable methods to be employed for the purpose; but it does not possess the power to absolutely prohibit any nomination being made. Such an attempt would constitute an arbitrary interference with the liberty of the people to freely associate themselves for the purpose of expressing such choice for their elective offices as they might select and for reasons they might see fit.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissente.g. Bryant v. O'DONNELL“A statute so plain and unmistakable leaves nothing for interpretation or construction. All that courts may do with such a statute is to observe it and enforce it. There is an omission in the law, it is true. But it is not the business of courts to supply omissions in laws.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent“The intention of a law is the essence of the law, and from this it follows that the primary rule of construction is to ascertain and give effect to that intention.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.