108 Wis. 2d 223 - Prah v. Maretti’s Empirical Analysis
1982
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 94 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 100 later decisions — most recently August 2018 · most notably 136 Wis. 2d 304 - Green Spring Farms v. Kersten (1987), 208 Wis. 2d 166 - In RE MARRIAGE OF COOK v. Cook (1997)
2 federal appellate · 94 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 15 U.S.C. § 631 (Business Opportunity Development Reform Act) · 26 U.S.C. § 44 · 42 U.S.C. § 6881
Relies on Village of Euclid Ohio v. Ambler Realty Co · United States v. Causby · Dimick v. Schiedt · Bielski v. Schulze · 87 Wis. 2d 723 - Morgan v. Pennsylvania General Insurance
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 100 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“`it is quite clear that under no circumstances can the plaintiff recover.'”
5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence“''Interest in use and enjoyment'' also comprehends the pleasure, comfort and enjoyment that a person normally derives from the occupancy of land. Freedom from discomfort and annoyance while using land is often as important to a person as freedom from physical interruption with his use or freedom from detrimental change in the physical condition of the land itself.”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence“the facts pleaded by the plaintiff, and all reasonable inferences therefrom, are accepted as true.”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.