108 Wis. 2d 548 - State v. Spanbauer’s Empirical Analysis
1982
Citation profile
10 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 12 later decisions — most recently May 2002
10 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Ashe v. Swenson · Commissioner v. Sunnen · 81 Wis. 2d 376 - State Ex Rel. Flowers v. Department of Health & Social Services · 92 Wis. 2d 372 - Thomas v. State · 87 Wis. 2d 804 - State v. Clark
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“On review of the sufficiency of the evidence, this court will uphold the jury’s verdict unless it finds that the evidence, considered most favorably to the State, is so insufficient in probative value and force that it can be said as a matter of law that no trier of facts acting reasonably could be convinced to that degree of certitude which the law defines as beyond a reasonable doubt. State v. Spanbauer, 108 Wis. 2d 548, 552 , 322 N.W.2d 511, 513 (Ct. App. 1982).”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“Under the Wisconsin Constitution and the Wisconsin Statutes, the circuit courts of this state are given exclusive jurisdiction over all criminal matters. The legislature did not intend to delegate to a non-elected hearing examiner in parole revocation proceedings the authority to determine the guilt or innocence of a defendant. The decision not to revoke Spanbauer's parole is not a binding adjudication of the merits of the criminal charge against him.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“Spanbauer seeks to distinguish [State ex rel. Flowers v. DHSS, 81 Wis. 2d 376 , 260 N.W.2d 727 (1978)] on grounds that the revocation hearing in Flowers occurred after the criminal proceedings. The order of the proceedings is irrelevant because we hold that the proceedings are different in kind.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.