Pryor v. Davis’s Empirical Analysis
1895
Citation profile
8 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently November 1968
8 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Bland v. Bowie · McNeill's Adm'r v. McNeill's Creditors · Cruikshank v. Luttrell · Fore v. McKenzie · Hearrin v. Savage
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““If the funds the intestate received in his relation of trustee had been preserved, distinguishable from his own funds, capable of identification, they would not have'passed to the personal representative as assets for administration. His duty in reference to them would have been that of a depositary — the custody and preservation of them in their condition of identification, and the delivery of them on demand of the succeeding trustee or assignee.””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Sims v. Hipp
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.