Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 109 Ariz. 294 - State v. Alberigo

State v. Alberigo’s Empirical Analysis

1973

Citation profile

20
cited by 20 later decisions
7
states following
September 1984
most recently cited

20 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on People v. Richards · 100 Cal. App. 261 - People v. Whipple · 237 Cal. App. 2d 232 - People v. Wester · 196 Cal. App. 2d 171 - People v. Miller · State v. Tosatto

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 20 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““An escape is not justified on the ground that conditions of imprisonment are intolerable and inhumane so as to give the prisoner or escapee reason to believe or fear for his personal safety.” State v. Alberigo, 109 Ariz. 294 , 508 P.2d 1156 (1973), reaff’d in State v. Mulalley, supra.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. ““The instruction requested by defendant was taken from People v. Webster, 237 Cal.App.2d 232 , 46 Cal.Rptr. 699 (1965), in which the defendant claimed his companion threatened to kill him if he would not go along. The facts distinguish this case from the instant case and the instruction is only applicable in the specific circumstances of that case. “[1] It is well settled law that conditions in a prison afford no justification for escape. People v. Richards, 269 Cal.App.2d 768 , 75 Cal.Rptr. 597 (1969); State v. King, 372 S.W.2d 857 (Mo.1963), solitary confinement; People v. Miller, 196 Cal.App.2d 171 , 16 Cal.Rptr. 408 (1961), fear of prison officers; State v. Palmer, 6 Terry, Del., 308, 72 A.2d 442 (1950), bad food, brutal guards, recreation, education and medical attention inadequate; People v. Whipple, 100 Cal.App. 261 , 279 P. 1008 (1929), intolerable living conditions and brutal and inhuman treatment by guards; State v. Cahill, 196 Iowa 486 , 194 N.W. 191 (1923), cell infested with bugs, worms and vermin, and without bed or chair, unhealthy, food consisting of an inadequate supply of bread alone; Johnson v. State, 122 Ga. 172 , 50 S.E. 65 (1905), escape from Georgia chain gang to avoid unmerited punishment by guards; Hinkle v. Commonwealth, 23 Ky.Law Rep. 1988, 66 S.W. 816 (1902), fear on the part of prisoner in custody of sheriff of being shot by a third person; State v. Davis, 14 Nev. 439 , 33 Am.Rep. 563 (1880), condition of jail filthy, loathsome and vermin infested”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.