Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 109 Ariz. 427 - State v. Benton

State v. Benton’s Empirical Analysis

1973

Citation profile

12
cited by 12 later decisions
1
states following
July 2023
most recently cited

12 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 12 later decisions — most recently July 2023

12 state decisions

90197319801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Etchieson v. Texas · Evans v. United States · Owen v. Arizona · State v. Jackson · State v. Owen

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The defendant also claims that certain questions asked him during cross-examination and several statements made by the prosecutor during closing argument constituted reversible error, even though not objected to at the time. “The arresting officers testified that they merely served the warrant upon the defendant telling him it was for robbery and he said he was not involved in any robbery. The prosecutor asked him if he had told this to anyone else and he replied that he had not. No objection was made to this line of questioning and we cannot see that it raises any question of fundamental error. * * * ” State v. Benton, supra, 109 Ariz. at 428 , 510 P.2d at 744-745 .”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.