Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 109 F.1d 145 - Ex parte Stricker

Ex parte Stricker’s Empirical Analysis

109 F. 145 · 1901

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
February 1928
most recently cited

1 federal appellate · 1 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Pennoyer v. Neff · Terry · Ex parte Robinson · Savin · Boske v. Comingore

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““In the one the court sees and knows of all the acts which constitute the contempt, and needs no testimony to establish their existence as facts, while in the other testimony must be heard to inform the court, and, this being so, due process of law demands that this testimony should be heard publicly, in open court, and by both sides to the controversy, after due notice to the accused of what is alleged against him, in order that he may have an opportunity to meet and explain it.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.