Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 109 F.1d 265 - In re Todd

In re Todd’s Empirical Analysis

109 F. 265 · 1901

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
June 1942
most recently cited

1 federal appellate · 4 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 5 later decisions — most recently June 1942

1 federal appellate · 4 district ·

2019011910192019301940decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Referees respectively are hereby invested, subject always to review by the judge, within the limits of their districts as established from time to time, with jurisdiction to, * * * upon the application of the trustee during the examination of the bankrupt, or other proceedings, authorize the employment of stenographers at the expense of the estates at a compensation not to exceed ten cents per folio for reporting and transcribing the proceedings.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.