Vanatta v. Philad Co.

Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals

Decided Feb. 23, 1940.

Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1940-02-23

2 counsel of record

Relies on 28 F. Supp. 539 - Philad Co. v. Vanatta

Opinion by (per_curiam) · Decided 1940-02-23

¶1Lyon & Lyon, of Los Angeles, Cal., Morris Kirschstein, of New York City, and R. E. Caughey, of Los Angeles, Cal., for Philad Co.

¶2John Flam, of Los Angeles, Cal., for Willis N. Vanatta.

¶3Before DENMAN, MATHEWS, and HEALY, Circuit Judges.

¶4PER CURIAM.

¶5Upon stipulation of counsel for respective parties, and good cause therefor appearing, ordered appeal, D.C., 28 F.Supp. 539, and cross-appeal herein dismissed, each party bearing his own costs of appeal, that a decree of dismissal be filed and entered accordingly, and that the mandate of this court issue forthwith.