Stewart v. St. Sure

Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals

Decided Jan. 17, 1940.

Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1940-01-17

2 counsel of record

Relies on Kinney v. Plymouth Rock Squab Co. · Pothier v. · Phillips v. McCauley

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Opinion by (per_curiam) · Decided 1940-01-17

How this case has been cited

Cited by 16 later decisions — most recently November 1982

7 federal appellate · 5 district ·

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1J. L. Stewart, in pro. per.

¶2No other appearance entered.

¶3Before WILBUR, GARRECHT, and DENMAN, Circuit Judges.

¶4PER CURIAM.

¶5Application for copies of records to be prepared without the payment of costs for use in applying to the Supreme Court in forma pauperis for Writ of certiorari to review our decision of November 22, 1939 denying petitioner’s application for leave to file petition for writ of mandamus, is without merit.-

¶6As to the necessity of showing merit in the proposed proceeding, see Kinney v. Plymouth Rock Squab Co., 236 U.S. 43, 35 S.Ct. 236, 59 L.Ed. 457; Pothier v. Rodman, 261 U.S. 307, 43 S.Ct. 374, 67 L.Ed. 670; Phillips v. McCauley, 9 Cir., 92 F.2d 790; De Groot v. United States, 9 Cir., 88 F.2d 624.

¶7Application denied.