Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 109 F.2d 330 - Cleugh v. Strakosch

Cleugh v. Strakosch’s Empirical Analysis

109 F.2d 330 · 1940

Citation profile

24
cited by 24 later decisions
2
states following
December 2011
most recently cited

9 federal appellate · 1 district · 8 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 24 later decisions — most recently December 2011

9 federal appellate · 1 district · 8 state decisions

7019401950196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 651 · 18 U.S.C. § 655

Relies on Fernandez v. Phillips · Collins v. Loisel · Charlton v. Kelly · Factor v. Laubenheimer · Grin v. Shine

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 24 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The phrase ‘sufficient cause,’ in §§ 871 and 872 of the Penal Code, means reasonable or probable cause. This appears in § 1487 of the same Code, which provides that where ‘a party has been committed on a criminal charge without reasonable or probable cause,’ he shall be released on habeas corpus. * * * Evidence showing reasonable or proba ble cause to believe the accused guilty is sufficient.” (Citing cases.)”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. ““The alleged fugitive from justice has had his hearing and habeas corpus is available only to inquire whether the magistrate had jurisdiction, whether the offense charged is within the treaty and, by a somewhat liberal extension, whether there was any evidence warranting the finding that there was reasonable ground to believe the accused guilty.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “(i)t (was) immaterial . . . that two of the nineteen crimes for which appellee's extradition (was) sought were committed before (the new treaty was in force.).”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.