Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 109 F.2d 714 - Sorenson v. Sutherland

Sorenson v. Sutherland’s Empirical Analysis

109 F.2d 714 · 1940

Citation profile

12
cited by 12 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
May 1967
most recently cited

6 federal appellate ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 12 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently May 1967

6 federal appellate ·

70194019501960decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Appellate journey

Relationships

Relies on Chicot County Drainage District v. Baxter State Bank · Stoll v. Gottlieb · United States v. Throckmorton · Toledo Scale Co. v. Computing Scale Co. · Ashton v. Cameron County Water Improvement District No. One

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““In our opinion the various issues involved in the motion to vacate the decree were before Judge Caffey and his decision was binding on the later court. Chicot County Drainage District v. Baxter State Bank, [ 308 U.S. 371 ], 60 S.Ct. 317 , 84 L.Ed. [329], decided by the Supreme Court on January 2, 1940; Stoll v. Gottlieb, 305 U.S. 165 , 59 S.Ct. 134 , 83 L.Ed. 104 .””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.