Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 109 F.2d 835 - Fazio v. Cardillo

Fazio v. Cardillo’s Empirical Analysis

109 F.2d 835 · 1940

Citation profile

18
cited by 18 later decisions
1
states following
January 2012
most recently cited

6 federal appellate · 5 district · 6 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 18 later decisions — most recently January 2012

6 federal appellate · 5 district · 6 state decisions

7019401950196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 33 U.S.C. § 901

Relies on Matter of Leonbruno v. . Champlain Silk Mills · Claim of Verschleiser v. Joseph Stern & Son · Maryland Casualty Co. v. Cardillo · Matter of Scholtzhauer v. . C. L. Lunch Co. · Maryland Casualty Co. v. Cardillo

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “accidental injury or death arising out of and in the course of employment, and such occupational disease or infection as arises naturally out of such employment or as naturally or unavoidably results from such accidental injury, and includes an injury caused by the wilful act of third .persons directed against an employee because of his [or her] employment.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “an injury arises out of the employment when it occurs [1] in the course of the employment and [2] as the result of a risk involved in or incidental to the employment or to the conditions under which it is required to be performed.... [T]he fact that the injury is contemporaneous or coincident with employment is not alone a sufficient basis for an award.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “personal altercation between the claimant and a co-employee, over a matter unrelated to the performance of their duties.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.