Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 109 F.3d 330 - Hennon v. Cooper

Hennon v. Cooper’s Empirical Analysis

109 F.3d 330 · 1997

Citation profile

173
cited by 173 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
April 2020
most recently cited

60 federal appellate · 2 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 173 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently April 2020 · most notably Sellan v. Kuhlman (2001), Matteo v. Superintendent (1999)

60 federal appellate · 2 district ·

8001997200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)

Relies on Motor Vehicle Manufacturers Association of United States Inc v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company Consumer Alert · Berger v. United States · Securities and Exchange Commission v. Chenery Corporation · Donnelly v. DeChristoforo · Darden v. Wainwright

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 173 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “'minimally consistent with the facts and circumstances of the case,'”
    25 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “was contrary to, or involved an unreasonable application of, clearly established Federal law, as determined by the Supreme Court of the United States,”
    7 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “would place the federal court in just the kind of tutelary relation to the state courts that the [AEDPA was] designed to end.”
    7 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.