May v. G.h. Baldwin’s Empirical Analysis
109 F.3d 557 · 1997
Citation profile
24 federal appellate · 3 district · 1 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 98 later decisions — most recently October 2024 · most notably Max Lopez Jr v. Ga Smith Larry Loo a Acevedo Patterson 4a-2r (2000), Herman Resnick v. Warden Hayes Lt. Ernst Officer Myers (Dho) Counselor Aune Officer Wade (2000)
24 federal appellate · 3 district · 1 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc. · Harlow v. Fitzgerald · Anderson v. Creighton · Sandin v. Conner · Wisconsin v. Yoder
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 98 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“denied due process when he was placed in [a Disciplinary Housing Unit] pending a disciplinary hearing. [The inmate's] due process claim fails because he has no liberty interest in freedom from state action taken within the sentence imposed, and the Ninth Circuit explicitly has found that administrative segregation falls within the terms of confinement ordinarily contemplated by a sentence.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence“[Cjentral to all other corrections goals is the institutional consideration of internal security within the corrections facilities themselves.”); see also Hines, 148 F.3d at 358 (stating that institutional security is compelling interest); May v. Baldwin, 109 F.3d 557, 563 (9th Cir.1997) (same). 12 . Block, 468 U.S. at 586 , 104 S.Ct. 3227 (”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Larson v. Cooper“[FJederal courts ought to afford appropriate deference and flexibility to state officials trying to manage a volatile environment.”) (citations omitted); Bell v. Wolfish, 441 U.S. 520, 547 , 99 S.Ct. 1861, 1878 , 60 L.Ed.2d 447 (1979) (courts have”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.