Tallahassee Memorial Regional Medical Center v. Cook’s Empirical Analysis
109 F.3d 693 · 1997
Citation profile
7 federal appellate · 5 district · 5 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 29 later decisions — most recently January 2019 · most notably Doe 1-13 Doe 1-13 1-13 v. Chiles & a (1998), Florida Ass'n of Rehabilitation Facilities, Inc. v. Florida Department of Health & Rehabilitative Services (2000)
7 federal appellate · 5 district · 5 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. · Patsy v. Board of Regents of Fla. · Wilder v. Virginia Hospital Assn. · Schweiker v. Gray Panthers · In re Disbarment of Johnson
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 29 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“in establishing the methodology for their reimbursement rates, the amendment was 'not intended to encourage arbitrary reductions in payment that would adversely affect the quality of care.'”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“[W]hen a state elects to provide an optional service, that service becomes part of the state Medicaid plan and is subject to the requirements of federal law.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“(A)informing all persons in the State who are under the age of 21 and who have been determined to be eligible for medical assistance ... of the availability of early and periodic screening, diagnostic, and treatment services as described in section 1396d(r) of this title and the need for age-appropriate immunizations against vaccine-preventable diseases, (B) providing or arranging for the provision of such screening services in all cases where they are requested, (C) arranging for (directly or through referral to appropriate agencies, organizations, or individuals) corrective treatment the need for which is disclosed by such child health screening services....”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.