Shareholders v. Sound Radio, Inc.’s Empirical Analysis
109 F.3d 873 · 1997
Citation profile
13 federal appellate · 2 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 50 later decisions — most recently September 2016 · most notably Krebs Chrysler-Plymouth, Inc. v. Valley Motors, Inc. (1998), Robeson Industries Corp. v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. (1999)
13 federal appellate · 2 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Pioneer Investment Services Company v. Brunswick Associates Limited Partnership · In re Busy Beaver Building Centers, Inc. · Fellheimer Eichen Braverman Pc v. Charter Technologies Incorporated & Pc · In the Matter of Taxman Clothing Company Appeal of Arthur Winer Incorporated et al · Universal Minerals Inc Greenley Energy Holdings of Pennsylvania Inc
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 50 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The bankruptcy court may extend the time for filing the notice of appeal by any party for a period not to exceed 20 days from the expiration of time otherwise prescribed by this rule. A request to extend the time for filing a notice of appeal must be made before the time for filing a notice of appeal has expired, except that a request made no more than 20 days after the expiration of the time for filing a notice of appeal may be granted upon a showing of excusable neglect if the judgment or order does not authorize the sale of any property or the obtaining of credit or the incurring of debt under § 364 of the Code, or is not a judgment or order approving a disclosure statement, confirming a plan, dismissing a case, or converting the case to a case under another Chapter of the Code.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“[t]his deadline is strictly construed. The failure to file a timely notice of appeal creates a jurisdictional defect barring appellate review.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“Rule 8002(c) ... requires that even in cases of excusable neglect, the issue must be raised and the appeal filed within the ... window of Rule 8002 (Rule 8002(a)’s [timeline] for the appeal + 8002(c)’s [timeline] for the extension). The rule does not allow a party to claim excusable neglect after the [time period] ha[s] expired.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. In re Caterbone
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.