Selby v. Holcomb

U.S. Courts of Appeals

Decided September 28, 2004

This page is marked noindex.

U.S. Courts of Appeals · decided 2004-09-28

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently July 2007

1 district ·

Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion · Decided 2004-09-28

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

PER CURIAM:

¶1 Ricky Emanuel Selby appeals the district court’s order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint without prejudice for failure to exhaust administrative remedies. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Selby v. Holcomb, No. CA-03-520-2 (E.D.Va. Dec. 16, 2003). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

¶2 AFFIRMED