109 F. Supp. 3d 72 - Singh v. McHugh’s Empirical Analysis
2015
Citation profile
2 district ·
Relationships
Applies 42 U.S.C. § 2000B · 42 U.S.C. § 2000C
Relies on Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc. · Celotex Corporation v. Catrett H · Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly · Ashcroft v. Iqbal · United States v. Diebold, Inc.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“politically-disinterested military [and] good order and discipline ... are compelling governmental interests”). Particularly given that Plaintiff previously was counseled for personal use of his military email account, the court finds that the issuance of the First LOR was in furtherance of a compelling governmental interest and was a reasonable exercise of the discretion afforded to the military in matters of good order and discipline. 6 . Plaintiff also claims that AF 1-1 is”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Wilson v. Fanning“was enacted against a known backdrop of longstanding precedent involving judicial deference to military authorities)” Singh v. McHugh, 109 F.Supp.3d 72, 89 , No. 14-cv-1906, 2015 WL 3648682, at (D.D.C. June 12, 2015), and that there is a”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Wilson v. Fanning
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.