Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 109 Ga. App. 354 - Raif v. State

109 Ga. App. 354 - Raif v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1964

Citation profile

31
cited by 31 later decisions
2
states following
October 2019
most recently cited

3 federal appellate · 28 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 31 later decisions — most recently October 2019 · most notably 145 Ga. App. 231 - Radowick v. State (1978), 109 Ga. App. 636 - Blake v. State (1964)

3 federal appellate · 28 state decisions

160196419701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Mapp v. Ohio · Ker v. State of California · Fahy v. Connecticut · Wolf v. People of the State of Colorado · Williams v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 31 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““An arrest for a crime may be made by an officer, either under a warrant, or without a warrant if the offense is committed in his presence, or the offender is endeavoring to escape, or for other cause there is likely to be a failure of justice for want of an officer to issue a warrant.””
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent
  2. “There is no authority in Georgia under which a citizen may be arrested without a warrant and held for investigation to determine if he has committed some crime merely because the person making the arrest has a suspicion that the person arrested may have committed some then unknown crime.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.