In Re Doe’s Empirical Analysis
2006
Citation profile
8 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently April 2024
8 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on State v. Arceo · In the Interest of Doe · State v. Okumura · Richardson v. City and County of Honolulu · In Interest of Doe
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[w]here the best interests of a child is of paramount importance, consideration of all relevant evidence becomes a critical duty of the court in making a 4 NOT FOR PUBLICATION IN WEST'S HAWAII REPORTS OR THE PACIFIC REPORTER decision regarding custody and visitation.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. S.G. v. B.A.“A family member may be permitted visitation with the child at the discretion of the permanent custodian. The court may review the exercise of such discretion and may order that a family member be permitted such visitation as is in the best interests of the child.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. In re: AA“such [HRS § 587A-33(d)] rights and interests terminate on the condition the children are adopted or reach the age of eighteen”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. In re: AA
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.