Hackett v. Streeter’s Empirical Analysis
1985
Citation profile
7 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Williams v. Texas · Wing v. Amalgamated Sugar Co. · State Ex Rel. Kidwell v. US Marketing, Inc. · 43 Or. App. 527 - Valley Inland Pacific Constructors, Inc. v. Clackamas Water District No. 2 · Logosz v. Childers
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“If we require the trial court to consider the enumerated factors in rule 54(e)(3), then it logically follows as a corollary that the court must have sufficient information at its disposal concerning those factors. Some information may come from the court’s own knowledge and experience, some may come from the record of the case, but some obviously can only be supplied by the attorney of the party who is requesting the fee award.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.