Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 109 Idaho 985 - State v. Rice

State v. Rice’s Empirical Analysis

1985

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
2
states following
March 2012
most recently cited

8 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently March 2012

8 state decisions

401985199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Illinois v. Gates · United States v. Leon · State v. Lang · State v. Schaffer · State v. Cowen

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “the magistrate or judge in issuing a warrant was misled by information in an affidavit that the affiant knew was false or would have known was false except for his reckless disregard of the truth[;] the issuing magistrate wholly abandoned his judicial role in [such a manner or under] such circumstances [that] no reasonably well-trained officer should rely on the warranty] ... [3] [the warrant is] based on an affidavit “so lacking in indicia of probable cause as to render official belief in its existence entirely unreasonable[;]” ... [or] [4] a warrant [is] so facially deficient — i.e., in failing to particularize the place to be searched or the things to be seized — that the executing officers cannot reasonably presume [the warrant] to be valid. [Citations omitted.]”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “is to be construed consistently with the fourth amendment to the United States Constitution.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.