Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 109 Ind. App. 383 - Deshields v. Joest

109 Ind. App. 383 - Deshields v. Joest’s Empirical Analysis

1941

Citation profile

27
cited by 27 later decisions
2
states following
March 2010
most recently cited

27 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 27 later decisions — most recently March 2010 · most notably 175 Ind. App. 498 - Searcy v. La Grotte (1978), 176 Ind. App. 53 - Umbreit v. Chester B. Stem, Inc. (1978)

27 state decisions

7019411950196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Schmidt v. Brown · Cox v. Forrest · Fankboner v. Corder · 106 Ind. App. 468 - Switzer v. Armantrout · Stringham v. Chicago, Indianapolis & Louisville Railway Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 27 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “'By ["Jexelusive,["] the law does not mean that the right[-Jof[-Iway must be used by one person only, because two or more persons may be entitled to the use of the same way, but simply that the right should not depend for its enjoyment upon a similar right in others, and that the party claiming it exercises it under some claim existing in his favor, independent of all others. It must be exclusive as against the right of the community at large.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “that a person shall use a way every day for twenty years, but simply that he exercises the right more or less frequently, according to the nature of the use to which its enjoyment may be applied.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.