Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 109 Ind. App. 41 - Toenges v. Walter

109 Ind. App. 41 - Toenges v. Walter’s Empirical Analysis

1941

Citation profile

18
cited by 18 later decisions
1
states following
November 2002
most recently cited

3 federal appellate · 15 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 18 later decisions — most recently November 2002

3 federal appellate · 15 state decisions

601941195019601970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Opple v. Ray · Baltimore Ohio R. Co. v. Reyher, Admx. · Martin v. Lilly · Vincent v. Norton & Taunton Street Railway Co. · Bartley v. Chicago & Eastern Illinois Railway Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “"... one who is lawfully using a public highway, in absence of knowledge to the contrary, has the right to assume that others using it in common with him will use ordinary care to avoid injurying him."”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.