Kline v. Eubanks’s Empirical Analysis
1902
Citation profile
4 federal appellate · 27 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 36 later decisions — most recently November 2015 · most notably 9 to 5 Fashions, Inc. v. Spurney (1989), Moulin v. Monteleone (1927)
4 federal appellate · 27 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Kimball v. Harman · Bourlier Bros. v. Macauley · Seelig v. Dumas · Dickson v. Dickson · McCann v. Wolff
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 36 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[w]hen the general law was adopted (i.e., article 2315, Civ.Code), and for years afterward, the present system of labor was not known, and no necessity was felt for the new remedy.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“[w]ithout especially passing upon this point.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.