Sprowl v. Lockett’s Empirical Analysis
1903
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 2 district · 7 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 11 later decisions — most recently January 1953
2 federal appellate · 2 district · 7 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on 6 La. Ann. 104 - Knox v. Buhler · Succession of Earhart · 17 La. Ann. 189 - State ex rel. Remendo v. Judge of Second District Court of New Orleans · Clappier v. Banks
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““No testament can have effect, unless it has been presented to the judge of the parish in which the succession'is opened; the judge shall order the execution of the testament after, its being opened and proved, in the cases prescribed by law.””
2 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.