Contract against Silas H. Jaques and Asa D. Clark, on a promissory note made by Jaques payable to Clark’s order, and indorsed by Clark to the plaintiff. The defendants answered, separately. Trial, and verdict for the plaintiffs, in the superior court, before Brigham, C. J., who allowed exceptions, which were sustained, as reported 106 Mass. 291.
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 1872-01-15
How this case has been cited
Cited by 22 later decisions — most recently March 1988
1 federal appellate · 1 district · 17 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
¶1One of the defendants was sued as promisor, and the other as indorser, of a note ; and though by statute they may be sued jointly; yet they must defend separately. The court properly held that each was entitled to tax his costs.
¶2Taxation of costs by the superior court affirmed.