Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

109 Mass. 342

Commonwealth v. Sutherland

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · decided 1872-03-15

<p>An acquittal upon one indictment for receiving stolen goods is no bar to the prosecution of the same defendant upon another, without further proof of the identity of the offences than that the goods described in the second indictment are such that the averments of the first indictment might describe them.</p>

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1872-03-15

How this case has been cited

Cited by 5 later decisions — most recently November 1971

5 state decisions

2018721880189019001910192019301940195019601970decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

By the Court.

¶1An acquittal of the charge of larceny of certain goods is not a bar to an indictment for the larceny of certain other goods, although the last mentioned goods are of such a character that the language of the first indictment might describe them. Therefore the refusal to adopt the defendant’s request for instructions, and the instructions given, were right.

¶2 Exceptions overruled.

/109/mass/342 · .json · Public domain