Lanasa v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1909
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 2 district · 69 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 74 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently April 2021 · most notably Dunn v. United States (1932), 24 Md. App. 128 - Andresen v. State (1975)
2 federal appellate · 2 district · 69 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Dealy v. United States · Mitchell v. State · Bloomer v. State · McAleer v. Horsey · 5 H. & J. 317 - State v. Buchanan
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 74 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“A conspiracy may be described in general terms, as a combination of two or more persons, by some concerted action, to accomplish some criminal or unlawful purpose.... The essence of the offense consists in the unlawful agreement and combination of the parties; and, therefore, it is completed whenever such combination is formed, although no act be done towards carrying the main design into effect.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.