¶1(after stating the facts). Gray v. Barton, 62 Mich. 186, rules this case. It is so nearly identical in its facts and circumstances with this that we deem any further statement or discussion unnecessary.
¶2The decree is affirmed, with costs.
109 Mich. 186
Codde v. Mahiat
Decided April 28, 1896
Michigan Supreme Court · decided 1896-04-28
Bill by August Codde against Mary Mahiat to set aside a judgment, and for a new trial. From a decree dismissing the bill on demurrer, complainant appeals. The defendant, Mahiat, obtained judgment against the complainant for breach of promise of marriage, which was affirmed in this court. Mahiat v. Codde, 106 Mich. 387. Upon appeal to this court, complainant gave no bond to stay execution. Execution was issued, some real estate of the complainant levied upon, and sold.
Relies on Gray v. Barton
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Affirmed · Decided 1896-04-28
How this case has been cited
Cited by 7 later decisions — most recently June 1941
7 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
View the full empirical analysis of this case →