Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 109 MISC2D 204 - People v. Jacobson

People v. Jacobson’s Empirical Analysis

1981

Citation profile

10
cited by 10 later decisions
2
states following
April 2014
most recently cited

4 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently April 2014

4 state decisions

601981199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The policy underlying the finality of a ver-diet is reinforced by the practice of polling the jury after the foreman states the verdict. When the verdict ... was returned, the jury was formally polled, and everyone declared his or her assent. This procedure provided each juror the opportunity to speak up and/or dissent. The time for post-verdict doubts had passed.”) (citation omitted). 55 .The Senate Report accompanying the 1974 Enactment of Federal Rule 606(b) observed that the Rule would prevent”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.