Geer v. . Geer’s Empirical Analysis
1891
Citation profile
5 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 7 later decisions — most recently January 1965
5 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“It has been fully settled that a plaintiff may recover in ejectment upon an equitable title ( Taylor v. Eatman , 92 N.C. 601 ; Murray v. Blackledge , 71 N.C. 492 ; Condry v. Cheshire , 88 N.C. 375 ); and where, upon the face of record evidence, like that before us, the court would in a direct proceeding, as a matter of course, order the correction of a merely formal defect in the execution of its decree, it is unnecessary (though perhaps the better practice) to set forth the facts in the pleading. The same is true where it appears from the documentary evidence that the dry legal title only is outstanding in another; but where it is necessary to establish such equitable ownership by extrinsic testimony, then the facts should be pleaded.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Vaught v. . Williams
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.