109 N.C. App. 36 - Albritton v. Albritton’s Empirical Analysis
1993
Citation profile
30 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 30 later decisions — most recently May 2018 · most notably 171 N.C. App. 550 - Cunningham v. Cunningham (2005), 114 N.C. App. 125 - Fox v. Fox (1994)
30 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on White v. White · Armstrong v. Armstrong · 102 N.C. App. 199 - Atkins v. Atkins · 90 N.C. App. 58 - Beightol v. Beightol · 97 N.C. App. 77 - Miller v. Miller
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 30 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“We see no reason to remand this case on the basis that the trial court failed to make a specific finding ... when it was plaintiff who failed to provide the trial court with the necessary information.... [T]he trial court's failure to put a specific value on defendant's pension plan was not error.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“[T]he party claiming an interest in the [marital property], [has] the burden of proof as to the value of the [marital property] on the date of the parties' separation.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“the party claiming the property, here a debt, to be marital has failed in his burden to present evidence from which the trial court can classify, value and distribute the property, that party cannot on appeal claim error when the trial court fails to classify the property as marital and distribute it.... Furthermore, remanding the matter for the taking of new evidence, in essence granting the party a second opportunity to present evidence, 'would only protract the litigation and clog the trial courts with issues which should have been disposed of at the initial hearing.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.