Jackman v. Nance’s Empirical Analysis
1993
Citation profile
2 district · 20 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 42 later decisions — most recently May 2022 · most notably Savage v. Pierson (2007), Christensen v. Pack (2006)
2 district · 20 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on 96 Wash. 2d 568 - MacUmber v. Shafer · Matter of Estate of Dodge · 652 F. Supp. 1409 - Edward Leasing Corp. v. Uhlig · Roberts v. Greer · Clark v. Shannon
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 42 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“the family home despite financial distress, insolvency or calamitous circumstances,”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Herndon v. Grilz · In re Nilsson“Using a building partly for business purposes is not inconsistent with the claim of homestead protection provided it is and continues to be the bona fide residence of the family, (court’s emphasis) (citations omitted).”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. In re Nilsson · In Re Sullivan“reflect the policy of this state to provide a debtor with homestead protection which attaches to a “quantity of land” with the dwelling up to the amount of equity provided by the legislature, so long as any property claimed in addition to the bona fide dwelling, consists of land, appurtenances, hereditaments, tenements, etc., which are an integral part of the overall family enterprise. There are essentially two prevailing views regarding the availability of the homestead exemption. The first view focuses upon the use of the property. Many of the jurisdictions adopting this view are bound by constitutional or statutory mandates indicating that the homestead will include a certain quantity of land and dwellings. The second view is that currently held by Nevada. That is, the “quantity of land” and the dwelling and other buildings are limited only by the total value of the homestead, regardless of use, provided the claimants actually reside on the premises and use it as their residence.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. In Re Trigonis
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.